I am a detective. I need to move on to my other cases.
I must say that I have hardly ever seen a case where someone treated another person so badly. There is no doubt in my mind that Mary Soltis is an "out and out jerk". The popular term for this is "asshole". She has deliberately abused the trust placed in her by her students. She has used emails which have absolutely nothing to do with anything as a reason for expelling a student.
I composed and posted a short summary of my findings to the same reddit forums where I have been having so many discussions. Here it is below.
--+--
:MYSUMMARY:
Here is a summary of all the points made here and on other subreddits:
What Mary Soltis did is totally abominable, totally haraam - and this is what most Muslims would say. (Yes, I did block u/TheSocialABALady, but that is only temporary. I wouldn't be surprised if she and I saw eye to eye on a number of things.)
[[some content deleted]]
--+--
There are thousands of people on these forums. There is virtually no chance that my findings are incorrect. Again, I have argued this case successfully in front of an audience that numbers not in the hundreds but in the thousands.
I hope I will be able to move to my other cases. However, if people question my findings as a detective, then I will be forced to come back. I don't care. I am prepared to come back and defend my findings. Just keep in mind that unless you have something extraordinary by way of evidence, or some new piece of material of evidentiary nature that is truly earth shattering, nothing can change this finding.
This is an open-and-shut case. The facts of the case could not be plainer. This does not require a Hercule Poirot or a Sherlock Holmes. This is a fairly straightforward case.
I must say that I have hardly ever seen a case where someone treated another person so badly. There is no doubt in my mind that Mary Soltis is an "out and out jerk". The popular term for this is "asshole". She has deliberately abused the trust placed in her by her students. She has used emails which have absolutely nothing to do with anything as a reason for expelling a student.
I composed and posted a short summary of my findings to the same reddit forums where I have been having so many discussions. Here it is below.
--+--
:MYSUMMARY:
Here is a summary of all the points made here and on other subreddits:
- After due consideration, I am led to conclude that Mary Soltis acted in a way that merits the term "asshole", "out-and-out jerk" and more. Although I am aware that the use of the term constitutes the use of a profanity, I do not believe that using a term such as "jerk" does what she did justice.
- There is literally no chance that Mary Soltis did not act like an asshole. I have, by now, looked into virtually every other possibility. Redditors have come up with a range of alternative explanations as well as a range of alternative ways to communicate this. While I agree that my use of the profanity "asshole" may not be to everyone's liking, the other term "out-and-out jerk" should be an acceptable one to all.
- I am a professional detective but I am not posting this as a professional detective. I am posting this because I came to know this story and I was just so shocked.
- I have been told that there is really nothing wrong with my posts. Other than my use of a fairly commonly used profanity, a few things people on this and other forum have said or suggested:
- What Mary Soltis constitutes not just a sin but a grave sin.
- A sin against anyone is a sin - no matter whether they are Muslim, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist.
- This is the sort of sin that Catholics are saying would damn Mary Soltis to hell.
What Mary Soltis did is totally abominable, totally haraam - and this is what most Muslims would say. (Yes, I did block u/TheSocialABALady, but that is only temporary. I wouldn't be surprised if she and I saw eye to eye on a number of things.)
[[some content deleted]]
--+--
There are thousands of people on these forums. There is virtually no chance that my findings are incorrect. Again, I have argued this case successfully in front of an audience that numbers not in the hundreds but in the thousands.
I hope I will be able to move to my other cases. However, if people question my findings as a detective, then I will be forced to come back. I don't care. I am prepared to come back and defend my findings. Just keep in mind that unless you have something extraordinary by way of evidence, or some new piece of material of evidentiary nature that is truly earth shattering, nothing can change this finding.
This is an open-and-shut case. The facts of the case could not be plainer. This does not require a Hercule Poirot or a Sherlock Holmes. This is a fairly straightforward case.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.